Jurisdictional Autonomy and the Autonomy of Law: End of Empire and the Functional Differentiation of Law in 19th-century Latin America

Authors

  • Manuel Bastias Saavedra Alexander von Humboldt Fellow, Zentrum für europäische Rechtspolitik (ZERP), Universität Bremen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12946/rg26/325-337

Keywords:

empire, Latin America, legal history, indigenous peoples, frontiers

Abstract

This contribution discusses the collapse of the Iberian Empire and the transformation of legal regimes in 19th-century Latin America. While most of the literature on this period centers on the process of state-building and the reform of legal institutions, my discussion will focus on the important changes produced in the form of law according to Luhmann’s theory of functional differentiation. The main argument is that systems theory can provide a re-evaluation of the history of law in the 19th and 20th centuries if one focuses on the idea of the autonomy of law. I argue that this way of reading the functioning of law is analogous to the legal historical re-evaluation of early-modern Iberian legal regimes through the idea of jurisdictional autonomy. Taken together both ways of understanding autonomy in legal observation direct our attention to shifts in law that go beyond the question of empire and nation-state building.

Published

2018-09-06

How to Cite

Bastias Saavedra, Manuel, Jurisdictional Autonomy and the Autonomy of Law: End of Empire and the Functional Differentiation of Law in 19th-century Latin America, in: Rechtsgeschichte – Legal History Rg 26 (2018) 325-337, online: https://doi.org/10.12946/rg26/325-337

Issue

Section

Fokus 3