Une question interdite
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12946/rg03/033-037Abstract
Is legal history a left-over or is it waiting for a takeover bid (just like a company in serious trouble) which would allow the expression of new analyses and outlines for a better understanding of the contemporary western world? Its propositions of erudition, are they just interesting for small academic circles, or could they open a new pathway for fundamental reflections on the phenomenon of norms in general and the structure of its evolution in the special case of norm-production coming from Roman Christianity? And what is the significance of the idea of »legal tradition«, an idea forged in Western Europe, within the framework of a presumed global westernization without any counter-balance? The essay discusses the illegibility of legal history in today’s culture. Under the well reflected motto »The Forbidden Question« it concludes firmly: To renovate itself, this discipline has to perform its work in a new way, guided by a very precise and distinct vision on theory. The author examines the conditions for this.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2003 Author

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.