Wer Solidarität sagt, will etwas haben

Autor/innen

  • Michael Stolleis Frankfurt am Main

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12946/rg05/049-054

Abstract

Solidarity« can only have the meaning social communication attributes to it over time. The word occurs in the 19th century when former structures are conceived as being in crisis. The invocation of solidarity was meant to call upon a feeling of unity and support against internal and external threats. The workers’ movement, the Church’s social doctrines, social reforms, civil and constitutional theory (including their authoritarian offshoots), all refer to the notion of solidarity. Using the term was always meant in an educational, a demanding, a normative way. Most of the concrete demands based upon this concept are nowadays basic elements of national and European constitutional and social law. Thus the question whether »solidarity« should serve as the necessary moral completion of formal law remains unanswered. But the fact that the word today no longer finds a common consensus indicates that its zenith is already passed.

Veröffentlicht

2004-08-30

Zitationsvorschlag

Stolleis, Michael, Wer Solidarität sagt, will etwas haben, in: Rechtsgeschichte – Legal History Rg 5 (2004) 49-54, online: https://doi.org/10.12946/rg05/049-054

Ausgabe

Rubrik

Debatte